How does a whistleblower lawyer prove discrimination when it isn't as straight forward?
To put it simply, this is where the 'implied contract ' comes in to play. An implied contract is a contract that is anything apart from a written one and is routinely 'implied ' rights, rules and rules that the employee and the company must follow in order to keep everything above board. This is often taken as read when a worker has been with a company for a specified period of time (often, but not always six months or even more). These rights, rules and regulations are typically written down in the company book. This is something that might be a prized asset to a whistleblower who feels that they've been wrongfully terminated
In any company book, there'll be rules stipulating the disciplinary procedures of an individual and they customarily follow the 'three strikes and you are out ' rule. This implies that if an individual does something wrong, then they should get a verbal warning.
Do it again and it becomes a written caution. Eventually do it a 3rd time and the employer is usually quite inside their rights to terminate the perpetrator's employment. But there are examples that someone is being unlawfully terminated.When these procedures aren't followed in a termination process then it may very well become clearer that the employer is trying to get rid of the whistleblower for other means. A skilled whistleblower attorney will counsel that in that circumstance an employee who feels that they've been wrongfully terminated can use the company handbook and it's guidelines as evidence.
In some instances the employer could well use the excuse the individual simply was not performing in their job role or that they have been victim to staff cuts. An enquiry team of whistle blowing lawyers must exercise some sort of caution here because this might have been the case and probably had zero to do with the incontrovertible fact that the individual troubled was basically a whistleblower. Some cases are more clear than others.
As an example if the whistle blew on a company and less than a month later the employee had been terminated, then there is a reasonably good chance that the reason for the termination was retaliation for the whistle blowing act. If on the other hand half a year down the road the same worker suddenly found themselves out of a job, then this may be much harder to prove.
Just because a company has been acting either illegally or unscrupulously, it doesn't mean to say that a worker should suffer needlessly. Instead a whistleblower attorney can be on hand to explain their rights and what can be done about it.
To put it simply, this is where the 'implied contract ' comes in to play. An implied contract is a contract that is anything apart from a written one and is routinely 'implied ' rights, rules and rules that the employee and the company must follow in order to keep everything above board. This is often taken as read when a worker has been with a company for a specified period of time (often, but not always six months or even more). These rights, rules and regulations are typically written down in the company book. This is something that might be a prized asset to a whistleblower who feels that they've been wrongfully terminated
In any company book, there'll be rules stipulating the disciplinary procedures of an individual and they customarily follow the 'three strikes and you are out ' rule. This implies that if an individual does something wrong, then they should get a verbal warning.
Do it again and it becomes a written caution. Eventually do it a 3rd time and the employer is usually quite inside their rights to terminate the perpetrator's employment. But there are examples that someone is being unlawfully terminated.When these procedures aren't followed in a termination process then it may very well become clearer that the employer is trying to get rid of the whistleblower for other means. A skilled whistleblower attorney will counsel that in that circumstance an employee who feels that they've been wrongfully terminated can use the company handbook and it's guidelines as evidence.
In some instances the employer could well use the excuse the individual simply was not performing in their job role or that they have been victim to staff cuts. An enquiry team of whistle blowing lawyers must exercise some sort of caution here because this might have been the case and probably had zero to do with the incontrovertible fact that the individual troubled was basically a whistleblower. Some cases are more clear than others.
As an example if the whistle blew on a company and less than a month later the employee had been terminated, then there is a reasonably good chance that the reason for the termination was retaliation for the whistle blowing act. If on the other hand half a year down the road the same worker suddenly found themselves out of a job, then this may be much harder to prove.
Just because a company has been acting either illegally or unscrupulously, it doesn't mean to say that a worker should suffer needlessly. Instead a whistleblower attorney can be on hand to explain their rights and what can be done about it.
About the Author:
Are you conversant with the whistle blowing laws or thediscrimination laws being implemented in your office? Read on the tract of
Leonorr Cook about the workplace discrimination laws.
Leonorr Cook about the workplace discrimination laws.
0 comments:
Post a Comment