Working Well with a Life Insurance Lawyer

| Sunday, June 24, 2012
By Norbert Higensen


Life insurance is an excellent way to be prepared and to make sure that loved ones will be taken care of in any situation. These policies make it so that life's unexpected turns should not completely destabilize a family unit.

You may also want to work with a life insurance lawyer if someone in your family has passed. This way, you know that you are getting all of the life insurance that you deserve. There are many law offices with many different lawyers that you could pick. Of course, you will want to find the best lawyer from the best law firm that you can to help you. There are several things that you should look for in a good lawyer if you are going to find the best. The first thing that you will need to look for is experience in life insurance law in Los Angeles.

Sometimes, there may be an unexpected death and the beneficiaries may not be who the deceased would really have the money go to. You want to make sure that you take the time that you need to understand what your options are.

The first benefit that the life insurance policy can offer is coverage and protection if there is some kind of life event that manages to interfere with the kind of life that a person was living. If there is some kind of major accident or something health related develops, this policy can help to cover it.

Make sure you get specific numbers. Sometimes lawyers can be good at reassuring you without giving you specifics.

Do all that you can to make sure that you find someone that has taken a case like yours before and has been successful with the case. Take the time that you need to do your research so that you know you will be happy with your lawyer.

While you are looking for a life insurance lawyer you will want to call the law board in your state and make sure that you find someone that is ABA licensed. They should have a degree and you want to make sure that they have passed the bar in your area.

When you have found a list of the life insurance lawyers in the area you will then want to sit down for a consultation. Take time to meet with them so that you are able to understand more about their personality.

The other benefit that comes with insurance is making sure that loved ones are taken care of if there should be a death that happens. There is no way to predict when such a thing may occur, but being absolutely sure that loved ones are covered is essential for preparation.

Meanwhile, others are a little more relaxed. If your life insurance lawyer is familiar with the style of the judge who will be overseeing your case, you will know what is the best way to act while you are in the courtroom.

Make sure that you take the time that you need to understand how you are going to pay them and what it is going to cost you to hire them. This way, you are both on the same terms and both ready and willing to work with one another.

The peace of mind that such readiness brings is one of the true benefits of the process. Peace of mind and the knowledge that things will be covered in the event of the unforeseen will make a big difference in the proceedings.

After the initial visit, you should be able to call and talk directly to your attorney. You should not have to get past the office secretaries, interns, or other assistants. If they will not give you this information, then you need to find a different lawyer to work with right away. The fourth thing you will want to look for in your attorney is the ability to listen.

If he or she is going to be able to handle your case appropriately, he or she is going to need to listen to your side of the story. You will be able to tell whether he or she is a good listener the first time you go in to meet with him or her.




About the Author:



READ MORE - Working Well with a Life Insurance Lawyer

Consumer Advocacy's Effect on the Modern Business

| Sunday, June 17, 2012
By Robert Jellison


It's been said that in today's money-centric community if you want a voice, you vote with your greenback. With more corporations moving into the waters of conglomeration and rallying like-minded money to comparable causes which might be "good for business," it can be hard to make ones words be considerably more than a drop of water landing in a ocean of opinion. The fact remains, however, that we the buyer are (clearly) the life-giver in this economy. Undoubtedly we consumers could conglomerate also, correct? Surely we're able to work together to uncover positive conditions for the (gasp) public?

Enter consumer advocacy. If our money head to firms that then use that money in order to lobby to get regulation in Washington then one may determine that yes, we do actually vote with our dollar. By educating ourself about item sources, organizational tactics, etcetera we are able to efficiently pick what businesses stick around along with which companies do not. We also influence behaviour, if I'm a company and I recognize I'm being watched - I'm more likely to keep my grubby fingers out from the cookie jar so to speak.

The action of consumer advocacy is no new notion, nonetheless it seems to be a tool that may be starting to become understood by the public. Numerous cultural movements have used consumer advocacy as a tool for several years, but only now is it reaching a critical mass that's reinventing the standard business design.

Philanthropy is now a marketing and advertising instrument - and for good reason. If a business like Enlighten Natural Candles, who gives 25% of all of their earnings to charity, will get more business due to their philanthropic conduct then this is a good thing. It shows the collective ethic, which seems very much to be trending upward. Those of us parked in front of the T.V. may well not see it, but the Internet community absolutely does.

So do I purchase shoes from a business whom knowingly exploits workers, or from Toms which gives a pair away for every pair sold? Do I purchase a vehicle from a company which intentionally suppresses technological innovation that could improve safety and be more efficient or a vehicle from Tesla Motors who is approaching our oil dependence using brute innovation? I think the answer is obvious, the responsibility is on the back of the buyer to hold business's feet towards the flame. Make your dollar matter.




About the Author:



READ MORE - Consumer Advocacy's Effect on the Modern Business

How Consumer Advocacy is Changing Modern Business

| Saturday, June 16, 2012
By Robert Jellison


It's been said that in today's money-centric community if you want a voice, you vote using your dollar. With increased organisations drifting to the waters of conglomeration and rallying like-minded dollars to comparable causes that will be "good for business," it's not easy to try to make your words be considerably more than the usual drop of water landing in a ocean of judgment. The reality is, nevertheless, that we the customer are (clearly) the life-giver in this system. Certainly we customers can conglomerate as well, correct? Undoubtedly we are able to come together to uncover advantageous circumstances for the (gasp) public?

Enter buyer advocacy. If our money heads to businesses that subsequently utilize that dollar in order to lobby for legislation on capital hill then one can easily understand that indeed, we do in fact vote with our money. Through schooling ourselves with merchandise origins, business methods, etc. we can properly pick precisely what firms stick around along with which ones do not. We also influence behavior, if I'm a company and i also comprehend I'm being watched - I'm very likely to keep my grubby hands out from the cookie jar so to speak.

The act of buyer advocacy isn't any new strategy, however it seems to be a device that may be beginning to come to be realized by the public. Various cultural movements have used buyer advocacy as a tool for many years, but only now is it approaching a critical mass that's reinventing the typical business structure.

Philanthropy has become an advertising tool - and for good rationale. If a company like Enlighten Natural Candles, which donates 25% of all of its earnings to charity, receives additional business because of their philanthropic behavior then that is a positive thing. It shows our collective ethic, which would seem very much to be trending upward. Those of us parked in front of the T.V. may well not notice it, nevertheless the Web community certainly does.

So do I purchase footwear from a business whom knowingly exploits individuals, or from Toms who gives a pair away for each pair sold? Do I purchase an automobile from a manufacturer which knowingly eliminates technological innovation that would improve safety and be more efficient or a vehicle from Tesla Motors who's approaching our oil addiction using brute creativity? I think the correct answer is clear, the duty is on the shoulders of the consumer to hold business's feet towards the flame. Make your dollar matter.




About the Author:



READ MORE - How Consumer Advocacy is Changing Modern Business

What You Should Know About A Polygraph Test

| Tuesday, June 12, 2012
By Sarah Jane Smith


A polygraph test has a reputation for proving whether or not a person is telling the truth or not. When a lie detector procedure is administered, there can be one of three results. The results may be categorized as inconclusive. Sometimes the person is said to have passed the exam. The third possible result is that the person is found to be deceptive. It is important to realize that if you don't understand how the test actually operates, you may not realize what can happen when a lie detector exam is taken. The results may have little to do with truth or lies.



When considering if a lie detector test is valid, you should first learn how it operates. The device technically operates by measuring blood pressure, pulse, respiration and skin conductivity. The person being tested is asked some "control" questions to which the answers are known. Then, there are the actual test questions, sometimes interspersed with control questions. The physiological measurements for each of the questions are compared. The public belief is that the measurements will increase if the person is lying.

Public understanding is that a person who is attempting to deceive can't hide the physiological changes that occur with deception. By measuring the elements of physiology, the device will indicate when a falsehood is present. When this misconception is accepted, the results of the procedure will also be affected.

It may be surprising to know that a lie detector procedure is effective more as a technique for interrogation than as a way to determine whether a person is lying. The fear that one will be considered untruthful, and the fact that the examiner or the police may be less than forthcoming about the results of the examination can combine to cause disastrous results. The statements about the results of a law enforcement-administered test are not necessarily honest.

It has been proven that the results of the exam can be manipulated by the person being examined. If the role of control questions are fully understood and managed, the questions will be less crucial. Reducing the differences between the baseline and the measurements on the crucial questions will be read as truthfulness. Rather than trying to reduce the peaks due to key questions, increase the level of the baseline questions.

A good defense attorney will counsel clients to never undergo a law enforcement initiated lie detector test. However, a neutral or defense paid examination may be arranged and the results released if beneficial to the person under suspicion. If the test is required as a condition of employment, the person being examined would be wise to ensure that there is a full understanding of how the test works.

The Supreme Court and other lower courts do not accept polygraphs as anything other than pseudoscience. Results cannot be entered into evidence. Studies cannot prove accuracy of the tests.

Learning the facts about a polygraph test is important, particularly if you are in a position where you may be urged to take one. It is best to discuss the matter with an attorney before agreeing to such an exam. More information about the test and its role in law enforcement can be found by searching the internet, printed materials and other educational sources.




About the Author:



READ MORE - What You Should Know About A Polygraph Test

Scambook Class Action - Is This Protection Racket Business a Danger to You?

| Friday, June 8, 2012
By Noah Smith


The Mob and The Protection Racket

Looking up "protection racket" on Wikipedia, we find that "a protection racket is an extortion scheme whereby a powerful entity or individual coerces other less powerful entities or individuals to pay protection money which allegedly serves to purchase protection services against various external threats."

If you have ever viewed any mob movies, then you know all about the usual extortion scheme. It works this way: The mafia will "guard" your business if you pay up regular protection cash. As an additional prompt to small business owners, if they fail to pay on time or at all, then the hoodlums will pay a visit to the store, menace the staff, and maybe even set the whole establishment on fire.

If you are obsessed with absorbing mafia tales, look at Wikipedia to see if you can find entries based upon "extortion racket" or "protection racket." You are going to read all about La Manu Niera and all of its dealings dating to the 1800s. Enrico Caruso, a tenor of days gone by, was once terrorized by La Manu Niera. He got a note insisting that he pay $2000, and so he did, yet after he paid up, he got yet another note that this time demanded some $15,000! After he got the police involved, several arrests came about thanks to his efforts.

Present-day Protection Racket: Scambook

At the present, a modern-day mobster is shaking up the small business: It's called Scambook.com. This ultra-devious outfit, hardly surprisingly being operated out of President Obama's former residence of Chicago, perpetrates the online type of crushing store windows unless business owners fork over regular protection money. Weirdly, the Scambook scam actually comes with a crooked reputation. To wit, Webutation.com condemns them through a warning against them, the BBB cites them for not being accredited, and it also hits them with an F rating. Finally, the BBB even goes so far as to put up an actual "alert" against this website.

Scambook, the "free community service"

This website pretends that it is a free community site. This indicates that anybody at all is permitted to author a negative review on any type of business at Scambook.com. This clearly dismisses the whole concept of ethics and answerability because it empowers competitors to libel one another. It also permits dissatisfied customers to author libelous reviews on any given business without being challenged.

Yet Scambook.com is a business so it is all about the money. It expects businesses to pay $500 every month for the right to get in touch (through a form) with the original complainant of the libelous review. Thus, a business has to hand over about $6000 every year if it wants to get in touch with those people who are allegedly complaining about it. It goes without saying that any e-mail form is an automated type of technology, which means that Scambook.com hardly expends any cash on its own, but ends up producing quite a hefty profit from desperate business owners who want to repair their hurt business reputations.

Scambook injures reputable businesses

On the site Scambookscam.com, a business owner tells of her experience with Scambook.com. Damaged through the harmful reviews appearing on the site, said business strove to solve this issue, yet Scambook opposed the removal of the reviews despite the fact they were resolved.

Scambookscam.com also exposes how Scambook will stand in the way of posting complaints so long as a business, even those disreputable ones, keeps forking over $500 a month. The screwed-up reality is that Scambook suffers from a horrible rating from the BBB, yet it judges other businesses.

Scambook suicide

Back on March 24, 2012, a lady indicated that Scambook's falsehoods drove her spouse to take his own life. Scambook preyed on his business and put up a humongous amount of libelous reviews of it, causing the spouse to lose the business and his family to lose its residence. Back in January of 2102, said business owner committed suicide.

Mobsters fall, and fall hard

Infamous gang hardman Lewis "Scooby" Rodden was put into jail, with his buds, for utilizing threats and violence on businesses. At times, it takes a while, yet bad guys fall hard!

Class action suit

There is currently a class action suit forming against Scambook.com, and over 200 complaints have already been gathered. If you or anyone you know has been hurt by Scambook, please write to scambookhurtme@hotmail.com. A Chicago-based law firm is gathering the claims.




About the Author:



READ MORE - Scambook Class Action - Is This Protection Racket Business a Danger to You?

The Truth Behind The WhistleBlower Hotline

| Wednesday, June 6, 2012
By Tommie Newman


For people who have come to witness some anomalies in a company, there is a law that allows them to expose such fraudulent acts in the government's behalf. For their risks and efforts, they are allowed to contact a whistleblower hotline. They can prosecute a company who is engage in frauds thereafter.

The witness is allowed to sue a company or a corporation if he has the evidences to support his claim. Of course, the evidences should be a clear proof of the fraudulent acts of the said enterprise towards the government. The case does not include the tax fraud, though.

The corporation must be large though since small companies can just declare bankruptcy so that they can avoid paying the compensation amount. With regards to the amount that can be taken out of the lawsuit, the person is allowed to take at least 15 percent of it.

The false claims are also being categorized into different charges. It is important that a differentiation is met. This is so that those parties who have false claims can be punished no matter what. They will be charged guilty of the criminal act of fraud.

Anyone is definitely prohibited from possessing, authorizing a delivery, or the delivery of any money or property that has a goal of defrauding the state. Otherwise, those who violate the law will be given their due punishment. Most of the times, they will be asked to compensate large sum of money.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act is also in motion. With this, the person who exposes the anomalies of the company can be protected in case the employer retaliates. For this matter, four conditions need to be met before the said act can be invoked.

For a person who has called a WhistleBlower hotline and invoking the SOA, the requirement that he be involved in a protected activity should be met. The employer should also know about this involvement and should have given undue treatment because of this. In addition, the treatment should be resulted from the protected activity.




About the Author:



READ MORE - The Truth Behind The WhistleBlower Hotline

Enhancing Employee's Rights Through The Whistleblower Act

| Tuesday, June 5, 2012
By Tommie Newman


If you have one complaint against your boss for mistreatment, you never have to worry about this. You actually have the right to do so and be protected for doing it through the whistleblower act. There are several benefits as to why this ruling has been promulgated by the U. S. Government.

The law was made to enhance and protect the rights of workers with the same goal as lessening the increasing amount of violations with regards to health and safety in most workplaces. Most of the time, this is to secure the career of those who have complaints of their bosses.

Furthermore, it was made to penalize sectors who do not comply with the rulings that surround them. The American government made sure that some conditions were made to order to give them what they deserve.

Now one can make complaints even against his own employer, be it for mistreatment or due to dangerous working conditions. If his employer punishes him just for telling, then he is now a violator of the said employee's rights.

If you want to do this, you need to contact the Occupational Safety and Health Administration office in your area right away. Your complaints should be in written form and must be certified and mailed to the office, though they accept faxes too.

An interview will then take place which will also determine if it is necessary to have an investigation done. If enough evidence is found, then the administration will have the employer liable for everything he has violated. If he refuses, then there will be further investigation in court.

Without a doubt, this whistleblower act has really been so helpful to people who have been too afraid to go against their employers. With its corresponding conditions, they are certainly shielded from anything the opposition will do.




About the Author:



READ MORE - Enhancing Employee's Rights Through The Whistleblower Act